Re: [WilliamJames] how many people are caught up in the reading?
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.com wrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
Same here. If at least 5 of us are in the same boat, could we plan to take a week off from lectures to give us time to read and comment on past chapters? However, if no comments from delinquents emerge by Sunday evening, Jesse should assume we're not really committed to catching up and just send the next lecture as usual.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Andrew Kyser andrew.kyser@gmail.comwrote:
As am I. My apologies for not keeping up. That's why I've been so quiet on here. On Jan 17, 2014 8:09 AM, "Max Shron" max.shron@gmail.com wrote:
I am several weeks behind.
-- www.shron.net Please excuse brevity, sent on the move.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Eric Purdy epurdy@uchicago.eduwrote:
Thought it might make sense to poll people. Speak up, lurkers!
-- -Eric
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
I'm happy to change the schedule around to help people get on the same page. As you catch up, feel free to comment on the earlier readings.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.com wrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
Same here. If at least 5 of us are in the same boat, could we plan to take a week off from lectures to give us time to read and comment on past chapters? However, if no comments from delinquents emerge by Sunday evening, Jesse should assume we're not really committed to catching up and just send the next lecture as usual.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Andrew Kyser andrew.kyser@gmail.comwrote:
As am I. My apologies for not keeping up. That's why I've been so quiet on here. On Jan 17, 2014 8:09 AM, "Max Shron" max.shron@gmail.com wrote:
I am several weeks behind.
-- www.shron.net Please excuse brevity, sent on the move.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Eric Purdy epurdy@uchicago.eduwrote:
Thought it might make sense to poll people. Speak up, lurkers!
-- -Eric
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
I'm also several weeks behind, but would need more than a week to catch up on James reading. I have been loosely following the comments on the list.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Jesse Raber jesse.raber@gmail.com wrote:
I'm happy to change the schedule around to help people get on the same page. As you catch up, feel free to comment on the earlier readings.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
Same here. If at least 5 of us are in the same boat, could we plan to take a week off from lectures to give us time to read and comment on past chapters? However, if no comments from delinquents emerge by Sunday evening, Jesse should assume we're not really committed to catching up and just send the next lecture as usual.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Andrew Kyser andrew.kyser@gmail.comwrote:
As am I. My apologies for not keeping up. That's why I've been so quiet on here. On Jan 17, 2014 8:09 AM, "Max Shron" max.shron@gmail.com wrote:
I am several weeks behind.
-- www.shron.net Please excuse brevity, sent on the move.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Eric Purdy epurdy@uchicago.eduwrote:
> Thought it might make sense to poll people. Speak up, lurkers! > > -- > -Eric >
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
There's no rush as far as I'm concerned. In fact I'd say the end of "The Sick Soul" is a natural turning point, a good place to regroup.
What would be a realistic target date for catching up? Two weeks?
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Elizabeth Topczewski bethtop@gmail.comwrote:
I'm also several weeks behind, but would need more than a week to catch up on James reading. I have been loosely following the comments on the list.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Jesse Raber jesse.raber@gmail.comwrote:
I'm happy to change the schedule around to help people get on the same page. As you catch up, feel free to comment on the earlier readings.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
Same here. If at least 5 of us are in the same boat, could we plan to take a week off from lectures to give us time to read and comment on past chapters? However, if no comments from delinquents emerge by Sunday evening, Jesse should assume we're not really committed to catching up and just send the next lecture as usual.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Andrew Kyser <andrew.kyser@gmail.com
wrote:
As am I. My apologies for not keeping up. That's why I've been so quiet on here. On Jan 17, 2014 8:09 AM, "Max Shron" max.shron@gmail.com wrote:
> I am several weeks behind. > > -- > www.shron.net > Please excuse brevity, sent on the move. > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Eric Purdy epurdy@uchicago.eduwrote: > >> Thought it might make sense to poll people. Speak up, lurkers! >> >> -- >> -Eric >> > > > _______________________________________________ > WilliamJames mailing list > WilliamJames@moomers.org > http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames > > _______________________________________________ WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
++ on being several weeks behind (so i've been saving most of these emails for later when i've caught up)
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Jesse Raber jesse.raber@gmail.com wrote:
There's no rush as far as I'm concerned. In fact I'd say the end of "The Sick Soul" is a natural turning point, a good place to regroup.
What would be a realistic target date for catching up? Two weeks?
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Elizabeth Topczewski bethtop@gmail.comwrote:
I'm also several weeks behind, but would need more than a week to catch up on James reading. I have been loosely following the comments on the list.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Jesse Raber jesse.raber@gmail.comwrote:
I'm happy to change the schedule around to help people get on the same page. As you catch up, feel free to comment on the earlier readings.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
Same here. If at least 5 of us are in the same boat, could we plan to take a week off from lectures to give us time to read and comment on past chapters? However, if no comments from delinquents emerge by Sunday evening, Jesse should assume we're not really committed to catching up and just send the next lecture as usual.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Andrew Kyser < andrew.kyser@gmail.com> wrote:
> As am I. My apologies for not keeping up. That's why I've been so > quiet on here. > On Jan 17, 2014 8:09 AM, "Max Shron" max.shron@gmail.com wrote: > >> I am several weeks behind. >> >> -- >> www.shron.net >> Please excuse brevity, sent on the move. >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Eric Purdy epurdy@uchicago.eduwrote: >> >>> Thought it might make sense to poll people. Speak up, lurkers! >>> >>> -- >>> -Eric >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> WilliamJames mailing list >> WilliamJames@moomers.org >> http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames >> >> > _______________________________________________ > WilliamJames mailing list > WilliamJames@moomers.org > http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames > >
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
ditto
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Clara Raubertas clara.raubertas@gmail.comwrote:
++ on being several weeks behind (so i've been saving most of these emails for later when i've caught up)
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Jesse Raber jesse.raber@gmail.comwrote:
There's no rush as far as I'm concerned. In fact I'd say the end of "The Sick Soul" is a natural turning point, a good place to regroup.
What would be a realistic target date for catching up? Two weeks?
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Elizabeth Topczewski bethtop@gmail.comwrote:
I'm also several weeks behind, but would need more than a week to catch up on James reading. I have been loosely following the comments on the list.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Jesse Raber jesse.raber@gmail.comwrote:
I'm happy to change the schedule around to help people get on the same page. As you catch up, feel free to comment on the earlier readings.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
> Same here. > If at least 5 of us are in the same boat, could we plan to take > a week off from lectures to give us time to read and comment on past > chapters? However, if no comments from delinquents emerge by > Sunday evening, Jesse should assume we're not really committed to catching > up and just send the next lecture as usual. > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Andrew Kyser < > andrew.kyser@gmail.com> wrote: > >> As am I. My apologies for not keeping up. That's why I've been so >> quiet on here. >> On Jan 17, 2014 8:09 AM, "Max Shron" max.shron@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> I am several weeks behind. >>> >>> -- >>> www.shron.net >>> Please excuse brevity, sent on the move. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Eric Purdy epurdy@uchicago.eduwrote: >>> >>>> Thought it might make sense to poll people. Speak up, lurkers! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -Eric >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> WilliamJames mailing list >>> WilliamJames@moomers.org >>> http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> WilliamJames mailing list >> WilliamJames@moomers.org >> http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames >> >> >
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
Let's say two weeks to catch up, and then keep going at half the previous speed. I'm caught up on the reading (well, I've skipped some of the side readings) but I've had to read faster than I like to.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jesse Raber jesse.raber@gmail.com wrote:
There's no rush as far as I'm concerned. In fact I'd say the end of "The Sick Soul" is a natural turning point, a good place to regroup.
What would be a realistic target date for catching up? Two weeks?
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Elizabeth Topczewski bethtop@gmail.comwrote:
I'm also several weeks behind, but would need more than a week to catch up on James reading. I have been loosely following the comments on the list.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Jesse Raber jesse.raber@gmail.comwrote:
I'm happy to change the schedule around to help people get on the same page. As you catch up, feel free to comment on the earlier readings.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
Same here. If at least 5 of us are in the same boat, could we plan to take a week off from lectures to give us time to read and comment on past chapters? However, if no comments from delinquents emerge by Sunday evening, Jesse should assume we're not really committed to catching up and just send the next lecture as usual.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Andrew Kyser < andrew.kyser@gmail.com> wrote:
> As am I. My apologies for not keeping up. That's why I've been so > quiet on here. > On Jan 17, 2014 8:09 AM, "Max Shron" max.shron@gmail.com wrote: > >> I am several weeks behind. >> >> -- >> www.shron.net >> Please excuse brevity, sent on the move. >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Eric Purdy epurdy@uchicago.eduwrote: >> >>> Thought it might make sense to poll people. Speak up, lurkers! >>> >>> -- >>> -Eric >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> WilliamJames mailing list >> WilliamJames@moomers.org >> http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames >> >> > _______________________________________________ > WilliamJames mailing list > WilliamJames@moomers.org > http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames > >
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
It might also help discussion if we broke future readings into chunks and emailed them out to the list every 2-3 days? Then people might find it easier to pace themselves?
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Eric Purdy epurdy@uchicago.edu wrote:
Let's say two weeks to catch up, and then keep going at half the previous speed. I'm caught up on the reading (well, I've skipped some of the side readings) but I've had to read faster than I like to.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jesse Raber jesse.raber@gmail.comwrote:
There's no rush as far as I'm concerned. In fact I'd say the end of "The Sick Soul" is a natural turning point, a good place to regroup.
What would be a realistic target date for catching up? Two weeks?
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Elizabeth Topczewski bethtop@gmail.comwrote:
I'm also several weeks behind, but would need more than a week to catch up on James reading. I have been loosely following the comments on the list.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Jesse Raber jesse.raber@gmail.comwrote:
I'm happy to change the schedule around to help people get on the same page. As you catch up, feel free to comment on the earlier readings.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
> Same here. > If at least 5 of us are in the same boat, could we plan to take > a week off from lectures to give us time to read and comment on past > chapters? However, if no comments from delinquents emerge by > Sunday evening, Jesse should assume we're not really committed to catching > up and just send the next lecture as usual. > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Andrew Kyser < > andrew.kyser@gmail.com> wrote: > >> As am I. My apologies for not keeping up. That's why I've been so >> quiet on here. >> On Jan 17, 2014 8:09 AM, "Max Shron" max.shron@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> I am several weeks behind. >>> >>> -- >>> www.shron.net >>> Please excuse brevity, sent on the move. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Eric Purdy epurdy@uchicago.eduwrote: >>> >>>> Thought it might make sense to poll people. Speak up, lurkers! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -Eric >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> WilliamJames mailing list >>> WilliamJames@moomers.org >>> http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> WilliamJames mailing list >> WilliamJames@moomers.org >> http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames >> >> >
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
-- -Eric
I like that idea. The best way to read William James is in a clean, sun-weathered hardback that smells faintly of pine needles, but there's a certain convenience factor to getting it right in your gmail.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Eric Purdy epurdy@uchicago.edu wrote:
It might also help discussion if we broke future readings into chunks and emailed them out to the list every 2-3 days? Then people might find it easier to pace themselves?
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Eric Purdy epurdy@uchicago.edu wrote:
Let's say two weeks to catch up, and then keep going at half the previous speed. I'm caught up on the reading (well, I've skipped some of the side readings) but I've had to read faster than I like to.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jesse Raber jesse.raber@gmail.comwrote:
There's no rush as far as I'm concerned. In fact I'd say the end of "The Sick Soul" is a natural turning point, a good place to regroup.
What would be a realistic target date for catching up? Two weeks?
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Elizabeth Topczewski <bethtop@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm also several weeks behind, but would need more than a week to catch up on James reading. I have been loosely following the comments on the list.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Jesse Raber jesse.raber@gmail.comwrote:
I'm happy to change the schedule around to help people get on the same page. As you catch up, feel free to comment on the earlier readings.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse take a week off from lecturing.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.comwrote:
> By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse > take a week off from lecturing. > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Gabriela Russek <grussek@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Same here. >> If at least 5 of us are in the same boat, could we plan to take >> a week off from lectures to give us time to read and comment on past >> chapters? However, if no comments from delinquents emerge by >> Sunday evening, Jesse should assume we're not really committed to catching >> up and just send the next lecture as usual. >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Andrew Kyser < >> andrew.kyser@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> As am I. My apologies for not keeping up. That's why I've been so >>> quiet on here. >>> On Jan 17, 2014 8:09 AM, "Max Shron" max.shron@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>>> I am several weeks behind. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> www.shron.net >>>> Please excuse brevity, sent on the move. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Eric Purdy <epurdy@uchicago.edu >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thought it might make sense to poll people. Speak up, lurkers! >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> -Eric >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> WilliamJames mailing list >>>> WilliamJames@moomers.org >>>> http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> WilliamJames mailing list >>> WilliamJames@moomers.org >>> http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames >>> >>> >> >
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
-- -Eric
-- -Eric
I am several weeks behind, could catch up or come close in two weeks, and would love if the readings were emailed out.
Wang
2014/1/17 Jesse Raber jesse.raber@gmail.com:
I like that idea. The best way to read William James is in a clean, sun-weathered hardback that smells faintly of pine needles, but there's a certain convenience factor to getting it right in your gmail.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Eric Purdy epurdy@uchicago.edu wrote:
It might also help discussion if we broke future readings into chunks and emailed them out to the list every 2-3 days? Then people might find it easier to pace themselves?
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Eric Purdy epurdy@uchicago.edu wrote:
Let's say two weeks to catch up, and then keep going at half the previous speed. I'm caught up on the reading (well, I've skipped some of the side readings) but I've had to read faster than I like to.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jesse Raber jesse.raber@gmail.com wrote:
There's no rush as far as I'm concerned. In fact I'd say the end of "The Sick Soul" is a natural turning point, a good place to regroup.
What would be a realistic target date for catching up? Two weeks?
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Elizabeth Topczewski bethtop@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also several weeks behind, but would need more than a week to catch up on James reading. I have been loosely following the comments on the list.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Jesse Raber jesse.raber@gmail.com wrote:
I'm happy to change the schedule around to help people get on the same page. As you catch up, feel free to comment on the earlier readings.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.com wrote: > > By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse > take a week off from lecturing. > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Gabriela Russek grussek@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> By "could we plan to take a week off", I meant, could we have Jesse >> take a week off from lecturing. >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Gabriela Russek >> grussek@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> Same here. >>> If at least 5 of us are in the same boat, could we plan to take a >>> week off from lectures to give us time to read and comment on past chapters? >>> However, if no comments from delinquents emerge by Sunday evening, Jesse >>> should assume we're not really committed to catching up and just send the >>> next lecture as usual. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Andrew Kyser >>> andrew.kyser@gmail.com wrote: >>>> >>>> As am I. My apologies for not keeping up. That's why I've been so >>>> quiet on here. >>>> >>>> On Jan 17, 2014 8:09 AM, "Max Shron" max.shron@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I am several weeks behind. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> www.shron.net >>>>> Please excuse brevity, sent on the move. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Eric Purdy >>>>> epurdy@uchicago.edu wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Thought it might make sense to poll people. Speak up, lurkers! >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> -Eric >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> WilliamJames mailing list >>>>> WilliamJames@moomers.org >>>>> http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> WilliamJames mailing list >>>> WilliamJames@moomers.org >>>> http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames >>>> >>> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > WilliamJames mailing list > WilliamJames@moomers.org > http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames >
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
-- -Eric
-- -Eric
WilliamJames mailing list WilliamJames@moomers.org http://mailman.moomers.org/mailman/listinfo/williamjames
participants (7)
-
Clara Raubertas -
Elizabeth Topczewski -
Eric Purdy -
Gabriela Russek -
Hannah Maier -
Jesse Raber -
Wang D